APPR

material drop 06 — reflection

cmq9k744s0184uxky2qhm20fa · PETREX® ☯ @higherhigh_petrex

special

User

PETREX® ☯

@higherhigh_petrex

Submitted

2026-06-11 13:54:30 UTC

Cohort

Cohort 1

closed

Reward base

2 points

Attempts

0 / 3

base 3

Reflection · 439 words

I totally support your idea, but if I'm going to be honest with you. This is not your opinion and I bet only 3 people dress it this way or if 10 people. What am I trying to say: people do not hire noisy people with plenty screentime. As you said, "I've 4 years experience as a Community manager" no longer cuts it. It's all repition in 4 places. But, one has to state what he or she actually did to grow the project. What I'm saying in essence is that, people can sleep online without being curious to grow. They are okay with the level of skill and growth they get without even knowing the world has grown beyond their skill, and this why some of them loose their job. AI only takes tge job from people who have refused to grow and expand. I will always hire one who is not noisy, and have a particular thing to bring to the table for little as each 3 hours per day than someone who stays 15hrs+ online without anything to bring to the table. You said, you had probably hire a 21 yr old who is active than a 35yrs old with resume that backs his years of showing up. That's straight up neglecting ones experience. I bet you that you won't hire such a person if working for a very big and established project. If you can, then you are just among the 3 out of 10 that will do. You wrote somewhere "What you check(and most people don't)" that means, 'most' people/hirer don't think this particular way you think, so people are still good go 😅 But, the key point I grabbed from everything you said is, we should document what we have done for other project's so we can present them on demand other than claiming we have 4yrs+ experience. Facts better land jobs. I won't hire a talkative or one who so active and online if they don't actually contribute actively to the project. 'GM and LFG' are all bunch of spams. The same reason you won't add a reply task to project's tweet boost because of fear of followers replying out of context without reading the write-up, but these are active members. You get to learn your real users from their educative replies. I study these patterns. Your so-called very active members reply off context to project's tweets just for couple of points and to be recognized as being active. I won't hire such people because you show up everyday to greet everyone and then leave 😅 I actually loved this material drop.

Validator · text-reflection

text-reflection: needs-review

{
  "reason": "awaiting reviewer read"
}

Review result

Reviewed at

2026-06-12 08:21:27 UTC

Reviewer

system

Points awarded

Ponts awarded

Comment / reason

experience doesn't mean that person is willing to use this experience, that's the problem in community management it's mostly about the vibes and about the feel of the community that's not a coding where experienced guy worked with 40+ libraries and builded 40 projects, so when he approaching new work, he probably done something like this before in community management 4 years of experience will mean that guy had experience with launching a Zealy campaign or settting the bots, but that's basically 0.1% of CM work, and that's easy to learn what you can't learn once again is desire to build a community, that's why those who had 4-5 years of community management probably burned out people but there is exceptions, me, for example :)

Submission approved · no further actions

"experience doesn't mean that person is willing to use this experience, that's the problem in community management it's mostly about the vibes and about the feel of the community that's not a coding where experienced guy worked with 40+ libraries and builded 40 projects, so when he approaching new work, he probably done something like this before in community management 4 years of experience will mean that guy had experience with launching a Zealy campaign or settting the bots, but that's basically 0.1% of CM work, and that's easy to learn what you can't learn once again is desire to build a community, that's why those who had 4-5 years of community management probably burned out people but there is exceptions, me, for example :)"